John went for a walk because

piloyniloy09@gm

part of the information the writer wants to get across. This iswhy this clause is rarely separated by a comma. Want to master freelancewriting? Sign up for early access to our course. Learn to future-proof againstAI, command higher rates, and land your dream jobs. Where the clause of purposeis the main point you want to explain, such as when the purpose of the sentenceis to insist that an action was taken for one reason and not for another, it isespecially important not to include a comma, in order to place clear emphasison the clause of purpose. For example:  it was anice day, not because he wanted to get

away from his family. When "because" is at the start ofa sentence An alternative Pakistan Mobile Number List  approach is to put the dependent clause at the startof the sentence, followed by the independent clause. In these cases, thesentence starts with “because” and a comma is needed to separate the twoclauses. Let’s rearrange the above examples into this shape: Because her oldcar kept breaking down, Sarah bought a new one. Because it was a nice day, notbecause he wanted to get away from his family, John went for a walk. Because ofthe steaks, I didn’t go to Dan’s restaurant. These sentences would be verydifficult to make sense of without the comma, as two clauses would be joinedtogether without any punctuation or conjunction to separate them. Putting thesubordinate clause first also has the effect of placing more emphasis on thatpurpose—there is no ambiguity

as to why I did not go to Dan’s restaurant. When to makeexceptions There are some situations where adding a comma before “because” willimprove the clarity of the sentence and prevent misunderstanding. This

most often occurs when the sentence starts with a negative clause.Look at this example: I didn’t go to Dan’s restaurant because of the steaks.One interpretation of this is that I did go to Dan’s restaurant, but the steaksweren’t the most important factor. They’re fine, but it’s something else thatdrew me there. With this meaning, the sentence could be continued like this: Ididn’t go to Dan’s restaurant because of the steaks, but because of the greatselection of wines. However, what I actually meant in the original sentence wasthat I did not go to Dan’s restaurant, and the reason I didn’t go was that thesteaks are terrible. A comma would help clarify this: I didn’t go to Dan’srestaurant, because of the steaks. The comma helps put emphasis on the firstclause, clarifying that “I didn’t go to Dan’s restaurant” is the main point and“because of the steaks” is the